News (All)

Can Employers Mandate that Employees Receive the COVID Vaccine?

Posted: January 13th, 2021

Published In: HIA-LI Reporter

As of May 28, 2021, the EEOC has released updated guidance. Visit our updated article here.

Since the first vaccines were administered in mid-December, employers and employees alike have questioned whether the workplace can require vaccination as a condition of employment. It will likely be months before the vaccine is available to most Americans, and thus it may be premature for private sector employers to propose a “vaccination for return-to-work” policy. However, on December 16, 2020, the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission issued guidance regarding employers’ obligations for mandatory COVID vaccination programs.

Essentially, the EEOC guidance provides that employers can require that employees get vaccinated as a condition of returning to work if their vaccination policies comply with the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), Genetic Information Nondiscrimination Act (“GINA”), Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, and other workplace laws.

If an employee declines to get vaccinated based on a disability[1] or a “sincerely held religious belief,” the employer must offer a reasonable accommodation to the employee, such as working remotely.[2] If no accommodation is possible, [3] then an employer may prohibit the employee from entering the business if that employee presents a direct threat to the health and safety of persons in the workplace, but the employer may not necessarily terminate the employee. Employers should evaluate these four factors to determine whether a direct threat exists: (1) duration of the risk, (2) nature and severity of the potential harm, (3) likelihood that the potential harm will occur, and (4) imminence of the potential harm.

An employer does not have to provide a particular reasonable accommodation if it poses an “undue hardship,” which means “significant difficulty or expense.” An accommodation that would not have posed an undue hardship prior to the pandemic may pose one now.[4] Prior to the pandemic, many accommodations did not pose a significant expense when considered against an employer’s overall budget and resources. However, the sudden loss of some or all of an employer’s income stream because of the pandemic is a relevant consideration. Also relevant is the amount of discretionary funds available at this time and whether there is an expected date that current restrictions on an employer’s operations will be lifted (or new restrictions will be added or substituted).

Additionally, EEOC guidance provided that the administration of a COVID vaccine by an employer is not a “medical examination” for purposes of the ADA and administering the vaccine or requiring employees to present proof of vaccination does not implicate GINA.

If you have questions regarding mandatory COVID vaccines in the workplace, please contact us

Thank you to Daniel Axelrod for his research and writing assistance with this article.


[1] Title VII as amended by the Pregnancy Discrimination Act specifically requires that women affected by pregnancy, childbirth, and related medical conditions be treated the same as others who are similar in their ability or inability to work. This means that a pregnant employee may be entitled to job modifications, including telework, changes to work schedules or assignments, and leave to the extent provided for other employees who are similar in their ability or inability to work.

[2] On November 8, 2020, the New York State Bar Association passed a resolution urging the state to consider enforcing mandatory COVID vaccination, even if people object for “religious, philosophical or personal reasons.” The EEOC, however, did not issue any guidance on that resolution.

[3] If a job may be performed only at the workplace, there may be reasonable accommodations that could offer protection to individuals whose disability puts them at greater risk from COVID and who therefore request such actions to eliminate possible exposure. Even with the constraints imposed by a pandemic, some accommodations may meet an employee’s needs on a temporary basis without causing undue hardship on the employer. If not already implemented for all employees, accommodations for those who request reduced contact with others due to a disability may include changes to the work environment such as designating one-way aisles; using plexiglass, tables, or other barriers to ensure minimum distances between customers and coworkers whenever feasible per CDC guidance or other accommodations that reduce chances of exposure.

[4] For example, it may be significantly more difficult in this pandemic to conduct a needs assessment or acquire certain items, and delivery may be impacted, particularly for employees who may be teleworking. Or, it may be significantly more difficult to provide employees with temporary assignments, to remove marginal functions, or to readily hire temporary workers for specialized positions.

WEBINAR: Paycheck Protection Program as Amended by the Economic Aid Act

Posted: January 13th, 2021

Event Date: January 15th, 2021

Join Gettry Marcus CPA, P.C. and Campolo, Middleton, & McCormick, LLP for our continuing webinar series on the recently passed Economic Aid Act (“EAA”), which has amended the Paycheck Protection Program (“PPP”) and now includes an Employee Retention Credit (“ERC”). The EAA has provided updated guidance regarding the first round of PPP loans (“PPP 1”) and announced provisions with respect to businesses applying for a second PPP loan (“PPP 2”) and the Employee Retention Credit.

Some of the key areas that will be discussed include:

PPP 1 and PPP2:
• SBA deadlines to apply for PPP 1 and PPP 2 loans through March 31, 2021
• Business type eligibility (and ineligibility) including certain non-profit organizations
• SBA affiliation rule overview
• Calculating the maximum PPP loan borrowing amount
• PPP loan terms, maturity date, and loan forgiveness application deadlines
• Updated definition of the “Covered Period” to utilize a PPP loan
• And more…

Employee Retention Credit (“ERC”):
• Extension and expansion of ERC
• Determining factors of qualifying for the ERC
• Financial reporting periods impacted that may qualify for the credit
• Calculating the credit
• Impact of having both a PPP loan and qualifying for the ERC

Program Panelists:

Christine Malafi, Esq., Senior Partner at Campolo, Middleton, & McCormick, LLP

Lee Ferber, CPA, Partner at Gettry Marcus CPA, P.C.

Nicholas Backmann, CPA, Manager at Gettry Marcus CPA, P.C.

Andrew Moore, CPA, Senior Manager, Gettry Marcus CPA, P.C.Time

DATE: January 15, 2021

TIME: 10:00 AM

CMM Welcomes Donald J. Rassiger to the Partnership

Posted: December 31st, 2020

Campolo, Middleton & McCormick, LLP, a premier law firm with offices across Long Island – and recently recognized by Forbes as a Top Corporate Law Firm in America – is delighted to announce that Donald J. Rassiger, Esq., has been promoted to Partner, effective January 1, 2021.

Leader of the firm’s sophisticated Construction group as well as Managing Attorney of its widely recognized Corporate group, Rassiger joined CMM as Counsel in 2016 and quickly became an indispensable resource for clients and colleagues alike. Having previously worked in operations and production, as well as having served as Chief Legal Officer of four companies, Rassiger has a unique understanding of the difference between business risk and legal risk. This special skill enables him to find creative solutions that achieve his clients’ desired results while complying with applicable laws, minimizing risk, and saving time and money. As a client recently described him, “Don’s ability to see where business needs intersect with legal compliance is well worth taking into your future and he can help cut the cord to the past.”

Rassiger has represented a wide range of construction clients including owners, developers, general contractors, subcontractors, engineers, architects, construction managers, and program managers, and has also negotiated countless collective bargaining agreements with union representatives. At CMM, in addition to his construction-related work, he draws on his significant experience drafting and negotiating business deals, transactions, and contracts including financing transactions, teaming arrangements, joint ventures, insurance placement, IT matters, bank loans, and construction claims. In addition, he has successfully closed over one billion dollars in M&A deals, both acquisitions and divestitures. As a member of the firm’s COVID Response Team, Rassiger has also helped many businesses renegotiate their financial instruments and bank lines as a result of the economic fallout of the pandemic.

“We’re thrilled to welcome Don as a Partner,” said Managing Partner Joe Campolo. “Not only is his well-earned promotion a milestone professional achievement for him, but also for the firm. Despite the difficulties of 2020, CMM was able grow this year and become even stronger. Don is an excellent lawyer and valued colleague, and we look forward to growing together in 2021.”

Malafi Talks Business Interruption Claims & COVID to NYSBA

Posted: December 30th, 2020

Event Date: January 14th, 2021

Join Christine Malafi for a broad discussion for attorneys about coverage for business losses, revenue and interruptions. Explore the coverages available and how shutdowns and Executive Orders will impact insurance. Hear about the latest updates about how these disputes are playing out across the country and in New York State.

This NYSBA virtual live CLE is for a total of 1.0 credits.

DATE: January 14, 2021

TIME: 12:00 PM – 1:00 PM

CMM Closes Multimillion Dollar Buyout of Multiple Mechanical Companies

Posted: December 23rd, 2020

Closing out a busy year of mergers, acquisitions, and buyouts as business owners changed course in response to the pandemic, CMM has completed another deal.

In a transaction that closed just before Christmas, CMM’s Joe Campolo and Vincent Costa represented a husband and wife in their buyout of three partners in three separate sheet metal and mechanical businesses as well as a real estate holding company. Paralegal Katharine Campolo kept the deal moving by keeping track of the myriad documents related to the transaction.

“Thank you, all of you, for all your support, hard work, and most importantly friendship and guidance through this whole thing,” the client shared after closing. What a wonderful way to end a challenging year!

For guidance on your merger, acquisition, business divorce, or reorganization, please contact us today.

Campolo Moderates HIA-LI Legislative Breakfast with Elected Officials

Posted: December 16th, 2020

Event Date: January 22nd, 2021

Joe Campolo will moderate the HIA-LI 43rd Annual Meeting and Legislative Program on Friday, January 22, 2021. The Zoom webinar runs from 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. Hear from your local and state representatives while you learn about Long Island business initiatives and the 2021 economic forecast.

Invited for Opening Remarks:

Lieutenant Governor of New York Kathy Hochul

Nassau County Executive Laura Curran

Suffolk County Executive Steve Bellone

Invited Panelists:

Congressman Lee Zeldin

N.Y.S. Senator Mario Mattera

N.Y.S. Assemblyman Mike Fitzpatrick

Register here!

CMM Represents RR Health Strategies in Acquisition by VMG Health

Posted: December 15th, 2020

In a busy year for M&A despite the pandemic, CMM is pleased to announce that the firm has closed a deal involving the acquisition of RR Health Strategies, a medical coding, compliance, and operational excellence management consulting firm, by VMG Health, a leading full-service healthcare valuation and transaction advisory firm. VMG Health is a portfolio company of Northlane Capital Partners, LLC. Joe Campolo and Vincent Costa advised RR Health Strategies (“RRHS”) and its President, Pam D’Apuzzo, in the transaction.

Longtime CMM client RRHS provides a full suite of medical coding compliance focused and operational excellence management (“OpEx”) services to health systems, academic medical centers, law firms, CPA firms, billing vendors, private equity firms, and healthcare practices. D’Apuzzo and the legacy RRHS team will now lead VMG Health’s new Coding, Compliance, and Operational Excellence service line.

“RRHS is uniquely qualified to augment VMG’s existing capabilities with new, compliance-driven offerings. Pam’s industry reputation and service capabilities made RRHS a top priority to add to VMG’s platform, and our entire client base will benefit from having RRHS as part of VMG,” said Greg Koonsman, Founder and CEO of VMG Health.

“We view the strategic partnership with VMG Health as only improving our capabilities, and it will give our current clients access to VMG’s wide-range of resources. We hope to leverage the VMG Health network to expand our reach and continuously improve our service quality,” D’Apuzzo added. “Working with Joe, Vinny, and the CMM team gave me tremendous comfort and enabled me to continue focusing on running my business rather than be consumed by the day-to-day demands of the transaction. I can’t thank them enough!”

Read more about the deal here. Learn more about how CMM’s M&A team can bring value to your next deal here.

Image by Bruno /Germany from Pixabay

Labor & Employment Team Achieves Favorable Result in Discrimination Case

Posted: December 14th, 2020

CMM has successfully defended our client before the New York State Division of Human Rights, culminating with the Division’s Determination and Order that a discrimination complaint be dismissed in the absence of probable cause to believe our client engaged in a discriminatory practice.

Our client, a technology company in the healthcare space, employed the claimant for less than a year, ultimately terminating the employee for poor performance. The former employee filed a claim with the Human Rights Commission, alleging that the termination was based on racial discrimination. The internal investigation by CMM’s Christine Malafi and Vincent Costa clearly demonstrated that the termination was based on poor performance. CMM submitted numerous position statements to that effect, supported by evidence including work records, our client’s need to hire a temporary worker to assist the employee in fulfilling the job duties, written warnings about the employee’s confrontational behavior, and witness statements.

After reviewing the submissions from both parties, the Division of Human Rights ultimately issued a Determination and Order dismissing the complaint, determining that there was no probable cause to support the former employee’s contention that our client had engaged in a discriminatory practice. The Order noted that “the evidence adduced does not support Complainant’s allegations of discrimination,” demonstrating the critical role that CMM’s investigation and submissions played in the case.

CMM has significant experience representing both employers and employees in employment-related investigations, claims, and litigation. Learn more and contact us today.