News (All)

Campolo Moderates HIA-LI Legislative Breakfast with Elected Officials

Posted: December 16th, 2020

Event Date: January 22nd, 2021

Joe Campolo will moderate the HIA-LI 43rd Annual Meeting and Legislative Program on Friday, January 22, 2021. The Zoom webinar runs from 9:00 – 10:30 a.m. Hear from your local and state representatives while you learn about Long Island business initiatives and the 2021 economic forecast.

Invited for Opening Remarks:

Lieutenant Governor of New York Kathy Hochul

Nassau County Executive Laura Curran

Suffolk County Executive Steve Bellone

Invited Panelists:

Congressman Lee Zeldin

N.Y.S. Senator Mario Mattera

N.Y.S. Assemblyman Mike Fitzpatrick

Register here!

CMM Represents RR Health Strategies in Acquisition by VMG Health

Posted: December 15th, 2020

In a busy year for M&A despite the pandemic, CMM is pleased to announce that the firm has closed a deal involving the acquisition of RR Health Strategies, a medical coding, compliance, and operational excellence management consulting firm, by VMG Health, a leading full-service healthcare valuation and transaction advisory firm. VMG Health is a portfolio company of Northlane Capital Partners, LLC. Joe Campolo and Vincent Costa advised RR Health Strategies (“RRHS”) and its President, Pam D’Apuzzo, in the transaction.

Longtime CMM client RRHS provides a full suite of medical coding compliance focused and operational excellence management (“OpEx”) services to health systems, academic medical centers, law firms, CPA firms, billing vendors, private equity firms, and healthcare practices. D’Apuzzo and the legacy RRHS team will now lead VMG Health’s new Coding, Compliance, and Operational Excellence service line.

“RRHS is uniquely qualified to augment VMG’s existing capabilities with new, compliance-driven offerings. Pam’s industry reputation and service capabilities made RRHS a top priority to add to VMG’s platform, and our entire client base will benefit from having RRHS as part of VMG,” said Greg Koonsman, Founder and CEO of VMG Health.

“We view the strategic partnership with VMG Health as only improving our capabilities, and it will give our current clients access to VMG’s wide-range of resources. We hope to leverage the VMG Health network to expand our reach and continuously improve our service quality,” D’Apuzzo added. “Working with Joe, Vinny, and the CMM team gave me tremendous comfort and enabled me to continue focusing on running my business rather than be consumed by the day-to-day demands of the transaction. I can’t thank them enough!”

Read more about the deal here. Learn more about how CMM’s M&A team can bring value to your next deal here.

Image by Bruno /Germany from Pixabay

Labor & Employment Team Achieves Favorable Result in Discrimination Case

Posted: December 14th, 2020

CMM has successfully defended our client before the New York State Division of Human Rights, culminating with the Division’s Determination and Order that a discrimination complaint be dismissed in the absence of probable cause to believe our client engaged in a discriminatory practice.

Our client, a technology company in the healthcare space, employed the claimant for less than a year, ultimately terminating the employee for poor performance. The former employee filed a claim with the Human Rights Commission, alleging that the termination was based on racial discrimination. The internal investigation by CMM’s Christine Malafi and Vincent Costa clearly demonstrated that the termination was based on poor performance. CMM submitted numerous position statements to that effect, supported by evidence including work records, our client’s need to hire a temporary worker to assist the employee in fulfilling the job duties, written warnings about the employee’s confrontational behavior, and witness statements.

After reviewing the submissions from both parties, the Division of Human Rights ultimately issued a Determination and Order dismissing the complaint, determining that there was no probable cause to support the former employee’s contention that our client had engaged in a discriminatory practice. The Order noted that “the evidence adduced does not support Complainant’s allegations of discrimination,” demonstrating the critical role that CMM’s investigation and submissions played in the case.

CMM has significant experience representing both employers and employees in employment-related investigations, claims, and litigation. Learn more and contact us today.

2021 Changes to Minimum Wage and Overtime Exempt Salary Threshold

Posted: December 2nd, 2020

It is that time of the year again. 2021 is nearly here and New York State has once again increased the minimum wage and the overtime exempt salary threshold effective December 31, 2020.

Minimum Wage Increase

Employers generally must pay nonexempt employees at least the minimum wage. Minimum wage throughout New York State may vary based on the employer’s size, geographic location, or industry.  There are different hourly rates for workers in the fast food industry and those who receive tips. The table below outlines New York State’s 2021 minimum wage:

Geographic Location / Increase from 20202021 Rate
NYC* (No change from 2020)$15.00 per hr
Nassau, Suffolk, & Westchester / +$1.00 per hr$14.00 per hr
Remainder of New York State / +$0.70 per hr$12.50 per hr

Next year, for Nassau, Suffolk, and Westchester Counties, the minimum wage will rise to $15.00 per hour on December 31, 2021. For the remainder of New York State, annual increases to minimum wage will continue until the rate reaches $15.00 per hour. The annual increases will be published by the New York State Commissioner of Labor starting October 2021. These annual increases will be based on percentage increases determined by the New York State Director of the Division of Budget, based on economic indices, including the Consumer Price Index.

* Unlike previous years, there is no distinction among number of employees for New York City employers.

Increased Salary Threshold for Overtime Exemption

Both federal law (Fair Labor Standards Act (FLSA)) and state law (New York State Minimum Wage Act and applicable regulations) generally require the payment of overtime wages for work performed after 40 hours per week. However, there are exemptions for certain salaried employees from federal and state minimum wage and overtime pay requirements. In addition to New York State’s minimum wage increase, the minimum salary that must be paid to workers classified as exempt under New York State Labor Law’s administrative and executive exemptions increased for 2021. As with minimum wage, the salary thresholds vary depending on the employer’s location and the number of employees. The table below outlines the revised salary thresholds in New York State:

Geographic Location / Increase from 20202021 Salary Threshold*
NYC (No change from 2020) $1,125.00 p/w ($58,500.00 annually)
Nassau, Suffolk, & Westchester / +$75.00 per week$1,050.00 p/w ($54,600.00 annually)
Remainder of New York State / +$52.50 per week$937.50 p/w ($48,750.00 annually)

For Nassau, Suffolk, and Westchester Counties, the salary threshold will increase to $1,125.00 per week ($58,500.00 annually) on December 31, 2021.

* Numbers provided are pursuant to New York State law and are higher than the federal FLSA thresholds.  Employees must meet certain duties tests in addition to their earnings or they will otherwise be eligible for overtime pay.

Future Minimum Wage Implications Across the Country

Twenty-nine states and D.C. have minimum wages above the federal minimum wage of $7.25 per hour. During the 2020 election, Florida residents voted to raise the state’s minimum wage, from $8.56 per hour to $15 an hour, in steps by 2026. Florida marks the eighth state in the county to adopt a $15 minimum wage (the other states are California, Connecticut, Illinois, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, and New York). This begs the question as to if there will be a national $15 minimum wage. According to a June 2019 study by the Congressional Budget Office, it is estimated that raising the minimum wage to $15 per hour would bring 17 million people out of poverty, but alternatively it could lead to 1.3 million job losses. In 2019, the House approved a plan to gradually lift the federal minimum wage to $15 per hour by 2025, but the Senate dismissed that legislation. President-elect Joe Biden has stated that he would like to raise the minimum wage to $15 per hour; however, the federal government does not currently have any plans for a potential increase.

It is very possible that legislation will be enacted to create a national $15 minimum wage, although this will most likely not affect employers in Nassau/Suffolk and the surrounding areas. Nonetheless, employers should review their wage and hour practices annually to ensure that their employees are properly classified as exempt or non-exempt and that current minimum wage and overtime rates are being paid to qualified workers. Take advantage of the new year to give your practices a fresh look.

If you have questions about minimum wage, overtime, or wage and hour exemptions, please contact us here or call (631) 738-9100.

New York State Enacts Paid Sick Leave Law

Posted: December 2nd, 2020

Published In: The Suffolk Lawyer

By Christine Malafi

Updated guidance was issued by New York State on January 20, 2021. Learn more here.

On April 3, 2020, during the peak of the COVID-19 pandemic, New York State enacted mandatory paid sick leave for full-time and part-time employees as part of the state’s 2020-2021 budget.[1] The new leave provisions, which amend the New York Labor Law,[2] take effect on September 30, 2020. Touted as “the strongest Paid Sick Leave in the nation,” the law provides for varying amounts of sick leave based on employer size and revenue,[3] with the employee being restored to the same position, with the same pay and conditions of employment upon return to work.

All New York employers should review the provisions summarized below and revise their current leave policies accordingly.

How much paid sick leave is required?

The amount of paid sick leave (at an employee’s regular rate of pay) is dependent upon the employer’s size within a calendar year (January 1 to December 31) and net income in the prior tax year.

  • Businesses with four or fewer employees in any year must provide each employee with at least 40 hours of paid sick leave per year, unless their net income is $1 million or less in the previous tax year, in which case such leave time may be unpaid.
  • Businesses with between five and 99 employees in any year must provide up to 40 hours of paid sick leave per year.
  • Businesses with 100 or more employees in any year must provide up to 56 hours of paid sick leave per year.

Employees must accrue paid sick leave at a rate of one hour for every 30 hours worked, beginning September 30, 2020, or upon the first day of employment. However, employee use of the required sick leave may be restricted for use until January 1, 2021. Alternatively, employers can opt to frontload the required time at the beginning of the calendar year.

Will unused accrued time carry over?

Any unused accrual amount must carry over to the following year; however, employers can limit the carry over to a maximum of 40 hours (if the employer has 100 or fewer employees) or 56 hours (if the employer has more than 100 employees).[4]

Unused sick time need not be paid out upon termination or separation of employment.

When can paid sick leave be used?

Sick leave may be used in partial days, but employers are permitted to set a minimum number of hours to be used at a time of not more than four hours. Covered reasons for taking sick leave under the requirement include:

  • Care, treatment, preventative care,[5] or diagnosis of mental or physical illness of the employee or the employee’s family member, regardless of whether the condition has been diagnosed or requires medical care; and
  • Needs related to the employee or employee’s family member concerning domestic violence, stalking, human trafficking, sexual offenses, shelters and service programs, safety planning, relocating, participating in legal proceedings or meeting with an attorney, social services provider, law enforcement, enrolling children in school, or taking other safety precautions for themselves or their family members.[6]

A “family member” includes an employee’s child or legal dependent, spouse, domestic partner, parent including legal guardian, sibling, grandchild, grandparent, and the child or parent of an employee’s spouse or domestic partner.

Employers are restricted in what information they can request from an employee requesting sick leave,and cannot request anything of a confidential nature from the employee.[7]

Correlation to Existing Policies

Employers may provide more generous sick leave policies if they wish, but those policies must be uniformly applied and should be maintained in writing.

Businesses with sick leave policies that comply with current New York City and/or Westchester County requirements may not need to make changes, but it would be wise to have your current sick leave policies and other leave policies reviewed to make sure you are in compliance with the new legal requirements in New York.

As the effective date approaches, we highly advise all New York employers to review their employee handbooks, PTO policies, and internal procedures to make sure there is no conflict between existing policies and the new legal requirements. Please contact our Labor and Employment Department at (631) 738-9100 if you need a policy revision, overhaul, or guidance on implementation for your business.


[1] All private-sector workers in New York State are now covered under NYSPSL, regardless of industry, occupation, part-time status, overtime exempt status, and seasonal status. Nonprofit employees must also comply with the law. Out-of-state employers must provide NYSPSL to employees who physically work in New York State.

[2] N.Y. Labor Law §196-b.

[3] Under NYSPSL, the amount of sick leave a covered employer must provide is determined by an employer’s size and net income in a given calendar year.

[4] Employers may set a calendar year to mean any 12-month period regarding use and accrual of leave.

[5] Because sick leave can be used for preventive medical care, it would cover absences for routine medical appointments, such as dentist and eye doctor appointments, and it may cover absences due to temporary closure of the employer’s place of business due to a public health emergency.

[6] The need for bereavement leave is not a valid reason under NYSPSL.

[7] Employers cannot require employees to work from home or telecommute instead of taking sick leave. However, an employer can offer employees the option of working from home or telecommuting as an alternative to using NYSPSL. If employees voluntarily agree to work from home or telecommute, they will retain any paid or unpaid sick leave they have accrued.

Newsday: Developing the Building Blocks of LI’s Future

Posted: December 1st, 2020

Long Island’s formerly best kept secret – the economic power of the LI Innovation Park at Hauppauge – is now headline news. In an editorial this week, the Newsday Editorial Board cited the LI-IPH as a prime example of how to “reuse, repurpose, and revitalize” properties. As HIA-LI Board Chairman, Joe Campolo has been instrumental in efforts to unleash the economic potential of the Park, including the development of mixed-use apartments to revitalize the site and attract the next generation of workers to Long Island.

It’s easy to spotlight the big parcels of land across Long Island that we hope someday will be home to enormously important projects, from Belmont and both Hubs, to Heartland and Calverton.

But the smaller efforts to reuse, repurpose or revitalize the older, tired parcels that dot the Island are just as critical, as building blocks for the region’s future.

Officials across the Island should start looking closely at the properties in their communities that could benefit from a similar overhaul.

They can look to Long Island Innovation Park in Hauppauge as a prime example of what’s possible. The 1,650-acre area, once known as the Hauppauge Industrial Park, has long been zoned for light industrial development, with little potential for anything new. Dozens of parcels have remained vacant; hundreds more are used for storage.

Now, Smithtown has jump-started an effort to bring retail, apartments and office space to the park. Town officials are starting small, allowing an exemption for 13 parcels, each seven acres or larger, so developers can build mixed-use commercial and residential projects on those spaces. It’s an excellent first step, especially in a town like Smithtown, where nearly 90% of housing is single-family homes and where apartments and other economic development are desperately needed.

But it must be just the beginning of bringing a mix of uses to Innovation Park and other sites like it. There are lessons to be learned, for instance, for areas like the Route 110 corridor, where two years ago Babylon Town unfortunately ended plans to rezone the East Farmingdale area.

It’s not just about remaking industrial parks. Shopping malls, stand-alone department stores and strip malls are being eyed, too. The clearest example: Seritage Growth Properties’ plan to redevelop Hicksville’s Sears site into a mix of apartments, retail and more. Look, too, at the Macy’s property in Manhasset, which is ripe for a reimagining.

Also critical: the continued redevelopment of Long Island’s downtowns. Last month, Roslyn Village became the latest to approve a rezoning, allowing as much as 60 units per acre and 40-foot tall buildings. For now, that’s limited to just two properties near the train station. Village officials should look for ways to do more.

As the coronavirus pandemic hit, several other downtown projects hit snags and delays, as meetings were put off and uncertainty reigned. We’re now seeing a restart of that work, in areas like Baldwin and Bay Shore. Local officials must move them forward, so Long Island can start its march forward, too.

— The editorial board

Read it on Newsday.

Business Interruption Insurance During COVID-19

Posted: November 30th, 2020

Tags: , ,

By Christine Malafi

Questions as to whether business interruption insurance will cover losses related to COVID-19 shutdowns and slowdowns have been asked since the first of Governor Cuomo’s Executive Orders in March requiring all non-essential businesses to shut down and have their employees stay home. Many claims and lawsuits have been filed since then, and pending legislation may have an impact on the results. What’s the latest guidance?

While policyholders across the country have filed hundreds of lawsuits against insurers seeking coverage for lost revenue and other business interruption losses related to COVID-19, to date there have only been a handful of court decisions, mostly favoring insurers, on the grounds that the policyholders failed to demonstrate a physical loss. For example, a New York judge orally denied a publishing company’s motion that argued the “virus exists everywhere,” finding that the virus “damages lungs. It doesn’t damage printing presses.”[1]

However, a few recent cases have favored policyholders. In Missouri, a federal judge allowed the plaintiffs to pursue discovery in a case alleging the pandemic resulted in a direct physical loss as a result of the shutdown order.[2] In New Jersey, a court rejected an insurer’s claim that COVID-19 related losses cannot qualify as covered losses.[3] And in North Carolina, a court found that the plaintiff’s business income losses resulting from the governmental shutdown constituted a “loss” to property, sufficient to trigger coverage under the insurer’s policies.[4]

Some states are considering mandatory business interruption coverage laws and applying them retroactively. New York introduced legislation in late March 2020 that would require carriers insuring against loss or damage to property to cover business interruption during a declared state of emergency due to COVID-19.[5] Currently, this bill is pending in the Assembly committee.[6] Other New York bills are pending on the issue, including a similar bill in the Senate and another related to providing such coverage to “insureds with coverage who operate programs and services including a mental health outpatient provider… substance use disorder treatment provider… and community-based program funded under the office of mental health.”[7] Currently, none of these bills are law in New York, and there will most likely be challenges under the contracts clause, the due process clause, and the takings clause of the U.S. Constitution.

Insured businesses should be proactive by collecting and retaining documents to support their loss, be ready to demonstrate the financial health of their businesses before and after COVID-19, and have their insurance policies reviewed to determine when and how to provide notice and what the potential insurance defenses may be. CMM can assist you with evaluating your insurance claim – please contact us today.

This article was co-written by Rosa M. Feeney of Lewis Johs Avallone Aviles, LLP.


[1] Social Life Magazine, Inc. v. Sentinel Ins. Co., Ltd., Case 1:20-cv-03311-VEC (S.D.N.Y. 2020).

[2] Studio 417 v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 2020 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 147600 (W.D. Mo. Aug. 12, 2020).

[3] Optical Servs. USA/JCI v. Franklin Mut. Ins. Co., 2020 N.J. Super. Unpub. LEXIS 1782 (N.J. Super. Aug. 13, 2020).

[4] North State Deli, LLC v. Cincinnati Ins. Co., 2020 WL 6281507 (N.C. Super. Ct. Oct. 9, 2020).

[5] New York Assembly Bill 10226-B8.

[6] See https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2019/A10226.

[7] See New York Assembly Bill 10327, http://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2019/A10327; see New York Senate Bill 8178; http://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2019/S8178.

Photo by Anastasiia Chepinska on Unsplash.

The WARN Act – What Business Owners and Employers Need to Know

Posted: November 16th, 2020

Note: this article was originally published in March 2020. It has been updated as of November 16, 2020.

The New York State Worker Adjustment and Retraining (WARN) Act requires covered businesses to provide early warnings of closures and layoffs to workers, employee representatives, the Department of Labor, and others. Unfortunately, as the coronavirus pandemic wreaks havoc on the economy, some businesses will be forced to close. Note that the WARN Act’s requirement to provide 90 days advance notice has not been waived, because the WARN Act already recognizes that businesses cannot always predict sudden circumstances. Learn more below about what businesses are covered, the steps you must take, and the information to file. Please reach out to us for guidance – we are here for you.

THE DETAILS

The WARN Act is administered by the U.S. Department of Labor Employment and Training Administration on the federal level and by the New York State Department of Labor on the state level.  Whether you are a longtime business owner or purchasing a new business, you must familiarize yourself with the complex requirements of the WARN Act.

On the federal level, a WARN notice is required when a business with more than 100 full-time workers is laying off at least 50 people at a “single site of employment.”  New York is one of a handful of states (New Jersey, California, Illinois, Wisconsin, and Tennessee) to establish more stringent WARN laws at the state level.

The New York WARN Act applies to private businesses (for-profit or not-for-profit) with 50 or more full-time employees within New York State.  WARN requires businesses to give advance written notice to all its employees as well as certain government agencies prior to particular layoffs, downsizing, or reductions in force.  It covers:

  • A “mass layoff” occurs when, over a 30-day period, a reduction-in-force results in an “employment loss” of more than six months for: (a) at least 25 full-time employees who represent at least 33% of all of employees at the work site; or (b) at least 250 full-time employees.
  • A “plant closing” is defined as an “employment loss” of 25 or more full-time employees during a 30-day period due to a permanent or temporary shutdown of the worksite.
  • Under WARN, a “relocation” occurs when “all or substantially all” operations are relocated to a location at least 50 miles from the current location and where 25 or more full-time employees suffer an “employment loss.”

Previously, under the WARN Act in New York, the government agencies required to be notified were the New York State Department of Labor and the relevant local Workforce Investment Board. But in an amendment signed by Governor Cuomo that went into effect on November 11, 2020 (Assembly Bill 10674-A), employers must now also provide advance notice to:

  • The chief elected official of the unit of local government in which the mass layoff, relocation, or employment loss will occur;
  • The chief elected official of the school district in which the mass layoff, relocation, or employment loss will occur; and
  • Each locality that provides emergency services to the site of employment where the employment loss will occur.

The New York WARN requirements are complex.  To complicate matters further, employment losses are aggregated over a rolling 90-day period.  So, employers not only have to look at whether employment losses taking place at a particular point in time meet the thresholds above, but they must also be mindful of employment losses in the recent past and anticipated employment losses in the near future when determining whether notice is required.  Also, certain workers, such as part-time employees working fewer than 20 hours per week or employees that have worked less than six months in the past year, are not counted when calculating the number of employees for WARN.

Employers should be mindful of WARN when buying or selling a business.  In M&A transactions, the seller is responsible for providing WARN notice for employment losses up to and including the effective date of the sale.  The buyer is responsible for providing WARN notice for employment losses post-closing.  On the closing date, employees of the seller automatically become employees of the buyer for purposes of the WARN notice requirement.  Because of this, post-closing WARN liability is commonly negotiated between buyers and sellers.  The parties are best served to work together when it comes to transitioning employees or letting them go.

Businesses that do not comply with WARN’s requirements may be required to pay back wages and benefits to workers as well as a civil penalty to the Department of Labor.  Each scenario is different and employers should consult with experienced legal counsel before making employment decisions.

Campolo Elected to St. George’s Golf and Country Club Board of Governors

Posted: November 13th, 2020

The membership of St. George’s Golf and Country Club in East Setauket has elected Joe Campolo of Stony Brook to its Board of Governors, where he will use his legal and business sense to help steer the Club through the twin challenges of the pandemic and a difficult economy.

With roles on the Long Range Planning and Membership Committees, Campolo is focused on creating a roadmap for the Club’s future. Recognizing that fostering and developing new business relationships is critical for the Long Island economy in 2020 and beyond, Joe will immediately get to work to enhance the member experience and attract the next generation of club members.

Campolo is Managing Partner of Campolo, Middleton & McCormick, LLP, a premier law firm recently recognized by Forbes as a Top Corporate Law Firm in America. In addition to running his own business and advising the who’s-who of Long Island about theirs, Campolo has kept an unyielding focus on growing the Long Island economy and investing in the community. His insight and no-fear attitude have led to some of the most significant economic initiatives on Long Island today, including the renaming, reinvestment, and rezoning of the Long Island Innovation Park at Hauppauge, the anchor of Long Island’s economy. A Marine Corps veteran, Campolo also serves on the Board of Directors of America’s VetDogs and the Guide Dog Foundation for the Blind.

St. George’s was established in 1915 and has repeatedly earned a coveted spot on Golfweek’s Top 100 Classic Courses in America.