News (All)

Campolo Talks M&A Strategy in LIBN Spotlight Article

Posted: June 15th, 2017

What Is Your Business Really Worth?

By Bernadette Starzee

The prospect of preparing a business for sale and arriving at a price may sound daunting, but it’s not unlike selling a house.

“We tend to think buying and selling a business is a lot more complicated than it is,” said Joe Campolo, managing partner of Ronkonkoma-based Campolo, Middleton & McCormick. “But everyone understands what’s involved in buying and selling a house, and it’s not that different. It’s all about preparation.”

Campolo made the house-business analogy during a recent panel discussion entitled “Do You Really Know How Much Your Business Is Worth?” held at Dale Carnegie Training of Long Island in Hauppauge.

“Everybody understands that when you’re selling a house, you invest in the kitchen and the bathroom, and the landscaping for curb appeal, and you burn potpourri and play classical music when people come to see it,” Campolo said. “If the buyer walks into a house and it’s a mess, they won’t want it. The same applies to a business.”

 Just as clean houses sell faster, a business with clean records is attractive to buyers.  “If the books are a mess – if you pay your Home Depot bill out of your business account – you’re going to have a lot of explaining to do,” Campolo said.

JOE CAMPOLO: Selling a business is like selling a house: If it’s a mess, buyers won’t want it. || Photo by Judy Walker

 JOE CAMPOLO: Selling a business is like selling a house: If it’s a mess, buyers won’t want it. || Photo by Judy Walker

How a business is priced depends on many factors, and “the biggest delineator is the people,” Campolo said. “Sophisticated buyers will look at the management team. If you are planning to sell down the road, and you have good people, you may want to lock them up now – there is a lot of talent acquisition going on.”

Campolo noted that getting good people to sign a non-compete agreement can be a delicate matter.

“You may have this great team, they’re like family, and then you say to them, ‘Oh, by the way, sign this non-compete,’” he said, likening the deed to asking a fiancee to sign a prenuptial agreement.

“But you gotta have those big-boy conversations,” he said. “When a buyer is doing due diligence, and he sees this salesperson who controls a lot of revenue doesn’t have a non-compete in place, he’s going to say ‘Uh-oh.’ You might trust the worker, but the buyer doesn’t. As a business owner, you have to protect your assets.”

According to Campolo, there’s been a big shift in the merger-and-acquisition market. About 15 years ago, venture capital firms would come in, and they wanted control and would often downsize.

“It has shifted to private equity,” he said. “These professional acquirers of businesses are a best friend to business owners – they want to acquire the businesses and the business teams that, if they had more access to capital, would be able to grow. They want you to grow the business; they don’t want to take over. But they won’t be interested unless people are locked up.”

Nonfinancial variables can account for up to about a third of a business’s value, said Don Schatz, president of Dale Carnegie Training of Long Island, during the panel discussion.

Nonfinancial variables include organizational strategy. “What really counts is how well you execute strategy, and that comes down to people,” said panelist John Shillingsford, a partner at Hauppauge accounting firm AVZ.

“To build an organization takes years; you have to find the right people and cultivate them,” said Bruce Newman, president of Protegrity Advisors in Ronkonkoma, who rounded out the four-person panel. “A professional acquirer will look to see if the team in place can save them from having to recruit people for X number of years.”

Though there is a wide range of zeroes in business sales, the need to prepare in advance for a sale is consistent throughout all transactions. Another factor buyers look at is scarcity, Newman said. “Does the company have something no one else has?” he said. “Is the brand hard to replicate? Are there patents?”

“There is an emotional aspect when you are selling a business – it’s very stressful,” Shillingsford said. “We counsel owners to do advance planning to prepare for the sale – being prepared reduces stress and takes the unknowns out of the mix.”

Preparedness includes advance tax planning.

“Remember, there are three parties to any transaction: the buyer, the seller and Uncle Sam,” Campolo said. “Uncle Sam is often the biggest impediment.”

With proper planning, the sale can be structured to avoid large tax penalties. For instance, depending on the circumstances, “you might look at doing it as a stock transaction,” Shillingsford said.

Sometimes, there’s a fourth person in the transaction: the landlord.

“A lot of businesses don’t own their building,” Campolo said. “The landlord might see a change of control as an opportunity to get a big windfall and charge more rent. Buyers will look to see if there is a change of control provision in the lease.”

Buyers will analyze financial statements and profit-and-loss statements, Shillingsford said. They will look at key performance indicators based on the company’s industry, as well as whether the owners are overpaying or underpaying for things like rent.

“Is the company paying below market rent?” he said. “What happens if it goes up?”

The most difficult sell is when revenue is declining.

“We counsel businesses on how to at least get revenue flat or ideally growing before they sell,” Newman said.

Campolo said the most disputed issue in transactions is the status of the financials. Sophisticated buyers expect financial statements to be computed in accordance with GAAP (Generally Accepted Accounting Principles), but often they’re not when a small, less sophisticated business is selling.

It’s currently a seller’s market, with more buyers than there are good businesses to buy, Campolo said.

“There’s plenty of money out there,” he said.

Read it on LIBN: http://libn.com/2017/06/05/what-price-your-business/

Campolo Interviews Chess Champion and Political Activist Garry Kasparov at CMM International’s Human Rights Foundation Fundraiser

Posted: June 9th, 2017

Tags:

“On Long Island, Kasparov Talks Putin, Chess, and AI”
By Adina Genn

garry-kasparov-and-joe-campolo

Garry Kasparov and Joe Campolo

On the night before Former FBI Director James Comey testified about Russian election hacks, Garry Kasparov, the Russian chess champion, said in Woodbury Wednesday that nothing surprised him about Vladimir Putin.

“Putin in 1999 while meeting former colleagues at KGB headquarters said that once KGB, always KGB,” Kasparov noted at the Woodlands at Woodbury. “It was symbolic but also a clear message of what he’d do, given the chance.”

Kasparov made these remarks at an event by CMM International division of Campolo Middleton & McCormick, the law firm headquartered in Ronkonkoma. A fundraiser for the Human Rights Foundation, the event was the first in a series aimed at bringing global-matter discussions to Long Island. Kasparov is chairman of HRF, a nonprofit that aims to protect human rights in closed societies.

Speaking about his book Winter is Coming: Why Vladimir Putin and the Enemies of the Free World Must Be Stopped, Kasparov also shared insights on world events, chess and artificial intelligence.

“Chess was more than a game,” he said, speaking of his time as a world champion in the Soviet Union. “It was used by an accomplished machine to demonstrate their superiority.”

And politics flowed naturally from chess.

“I was introduced to politics because I could see at an early age, that as chess world champion, I could help people overcome fears and build a better country,” he said.

Kasparov has long stood in opposition to Putin.

“I think the most important thing for me is to make a difference,” he said. Kasparov wrote his “first article about Putin in the Wall Street Journal in 2001 about how Putin was our problem, then he would become the problem of neighboring countries, then everyone’s problem, not because I’m Nostradamus and can predict the future, but because I read a few books, I know what happens with dictators. I knew it was my duty to interfere.”

Speaking of losing a chess game Deep Blue, an IBM machine, in 1997, Kasparov said it was “painful,” but also said, “It’s up to us to look for new frontiers. Machines move us in that direction.”

But, he said, with technology terrorists “can build a sophisticated terrorist network. We are living in a world where enemies of the free world – ISIS, Putin, Al Qaeda – know how to use this technology and free speech to create an environment where they can recruit young people, not-so-young people, frustrated people.”

And he noted that the United States has lost its stature over time.

“The credibility of American policy has been shattered. Truman had credibility; Stalin believed Truman was a man of action. Ronald Reagan won the Cold War; he had credibility when he said, ‘Mr. Gorbachev, tear down this wall.’” Post Cold War, he said, “Clinton did little, Bush did too much, Obama did nothing and now maybe the pendulum broke.”

Still, Kasparov saw a bright spot, pointing out that there are “Optimistic people responding to threats. I hope people will learn to be more engaged. There is no one else but us to act.”

In hosting the event, the law firm aims to educate Long Island business owners about international business, legal, tax, regulatory, and important foreign affairs issues. A spokeswoman for the firm said that its additional sponsors – Sasserath & Zoraian, Investors Bank, the Claire Friedlander Family Foundation, Protegrity Advisors – helped raise funds for HRF.

Bernadette Starzee contributed to this report.

Read it on LIBN‘s website.

View photos from the fundraiser.

Newsday: “Keep Up the Global Fight for Democracy, Says Garry Kasparov at Fundraiser Hosted by CMM International”

Posted: June 9th, 2017

By Joan Gralla (joan.gralla@newsday.com)

Garry Kasparov, former world chess champion and an
Garry Kasparov, former world chess champion and an exile from Russia, where he was a pro-democracy opposition leader against Putin, speaks at a forum Wednesday, June 7, 2017 at Woodlands in Woodbury. The forum was a benefit for the Human Rights Foundation. Photo Credit: Chuck Fadely

Garry Kasparov, chess champion and chairman of the Human Rights Foundation, on Wednesday urged people to “stay engaged” in the global fight for democracy.

The United States’ biggest problem is that its credibility as a global leader has been “shattered” by every president since Ronald Reagan as people around the world saw it switch from too little engagement under Bill Clinton and Barack Obama and too much engagement under George W. Bush, said Kasparov.

Speaking at a dinner sponsored by the Ronkonkoma law firm Campolo, Middleton & McCormick, Kasparov also delved into how his career shaped his views of dictatorships and artificial intelligence. The event was a fundraiser for the Human Rights Foundation, a nonpartisan nonprofit organization that promotes and protects human rights globally, with a focus on closed societies.

Kasparov pinned Russia’s current lack of freedoms on Russian activists and the West permitting the re-election of Boris Yeltsin — and allowing him to cheat — to ensure Communists did not return to power instead of protecting the new democratic institutions that proved too fragile to withstand the rise of Vladimir Putin.

Under Putin, Russia is “besieged,” he said, adding:

“There people live in fear.”

Though Kasparov and his family fled ethnic violence in his native Baku as the Soviet Union collapsed, his 80-year-old mother, who still lives in Moscow, tells him Putin’s regime in some ways is worse than the communist state.

At least the Soviets offered a more promising though distant future, he said, while, under Putin, the propaganda machine portrays an entire world against Russia and “a culture of death.”

Kasparov, who is half Armenian and half Jewish, said his native country would never recover until it grappled with the sins of communism, as both Germany and Japan did with their World War II atrocities.

The same holds true for Turkey, which has never recognized the Armenian genocide, he said.

“Maybe it’s something mystical, the shadow over the dark past prevents you from recovering.”

Kasparov, honored as a hero in the Soviet Union after becoming the world’s youngest chess champion at 22, later lost a match to an IBM machine called Deep Blue.

Humans should not be afraid of machines, Kasparov said, jesting that 20 years from now children will wonder at how primitive this generation was for driving cars themselves, when automated cars are so much safer.

“Some good things could happen from technology because technology will help us move onto something else,” he said.

Read it on Newsday‘s website.

McCormick quoted in LIBN feature “Staying on Course with Diversity in Law”

Posted: June 7th, 2017

Unyielding in its pursuit to take the necessary time to understand their clients’ unique needs, Campolo, Middleton & McCormick, LLP has played a central role in the most critical legal issues and transactions affecting Long Island. As immigration, LGBT and social issues continue to surface in headline news across the nation, the firm remains determined to promote diversity and inclusion in law.

“You can’t turn on the TV or open any newspaper without there being some discussion of border walls and immigration and religious issues,” said Campolo, Middleton & McCormick Partner Patrick McCormick. “Lawyers have an obligation to play a role in the education of the public and making people aware of the issues and everyone’s rights – this is all part of diversity and inclusiveness.”

Responding to today’s political climate, Campolo Middleton & McCormick, with offices in Ronkonkoma and Bridgehampton, NY, is reinforcing its longstanding pledge to not only be more involved in the education of diversity within its firm and the legal community, but making sure opportunities are there for all people who seek counsel.

“Our firm is committed to building educational programs that offer training for our staff, as well as host various programs related to these issues for our clients and the public,” said McCormick, who also heads the firm’s litigation and appeals practice. “The legal profession is supposed to be leading the way on these issues, making sure that those who do not have all the opportunities that others have, have access to the court system and have access to services and quality lawyers.”

The firm also takes a strong position that the public should always have legal options and more importantly, they should be aware of these options.

“Our firm feels strongly about educating not only lawyers but the public, as well,” McCormick explained. “They should know what services are available to them. It is our obligation.”

To bring more diversity into the legal community, the Continuing Legal Education (CLE) Board is currently evaluating (as of this writing) a proposed requirement that in every two-year cycle every attorney is obligated to take one credit in diversity and the elimination of bias. “The idea is to increase awareness of diversity and inclusion and promote equality of opportunity within the legal profession,” McCormick noted. “It is a very laudable goal, so it is clear that this issue is on everyone’s mind.”

Diversity and inclusion have been the unwavering foundation of Campolo, Middleton & McCormick since its launch in 2008. McCormick also works with the Suffolk County Bar Association as associate dean of its Suffolk Academy of Law — the Bar’s educational branch — to promote diversity within the legal community, and will continue this initiative as he spearheads Suffolk Academy of Law’s educational programs as its new dean, effective June 2, 2017.

The Suffolk County Bar Association, which is comprised of 2,800 lawyers and judges, and the Suffolk Academy of Law have always been in the forefront of this entire issue, McCormick noted.

“We should all be involved — every lawyer, regardless of what their individual practice, their firm culture or their political beliefs are,” McCormick said. “This goes back historically to ‘right to counsel’ for the indigent in criminal legal proceedings. Everyone should have access to legal counsel.”

The legal community is historically charged with ensuring everyone is treated equally before the law, he explained. “Nobody should be discriminated against or excluded from equal access and the ability to engage in the process,” he added.

Diversity and inclusion are key components to assuring everyone receives legal counsel and Campolo, Middleton & McCormick is proud to be part of this important initiative.

“There is much more awareness throughout the law profession in both the desire and the need for diversity and inclusiveness and our firm is proud to be leading the way,” McCormick said.

Campolo’s Economic Impact Study featured in “Leaders Speak of a ‘Retrofitted’ Suburbia”

Posted: May 25th, 2017

By Adina GennLong Island Business News
Two transportation initiatives announced Wednesday will boost Long Island’s economy, Suffolk County Executive Steve Bellone told local leaders at the Hauppauge Industrial Association Business Trade Show & Conference executive lunch today in Brentwood.  Those projects – the MTA-approved funding for the proposed LIRR third track and the addition of Denver-based Frontier Airlines, which will start service at Long Island MacArthur Airport to Orlando – will help to retrofit suburbia, he said. The efforts will help to make the region competitive, attracting a young knowledge workforce.

“It will create an environment in which they can thrive and make the region accessible to them,” he said.

These initiatives “don’t happen in a vacuum,” said Mitch Pally, CEO of Long Island Builders Institute, crediting support from private-public initiatives.

In particular, LIRR initiatives, which include East Side access, and a second-track project in Hicksville, would “increase capacity by 40 percent,” boosting the value of land near railroad tracks, as people seek transit-oriented development.

About 4,500 attendees attended the expo, which boasted 375 exhibitors.

The HIA is home to nearly 1,350 businesses, employing an estimated 55,000 people, according to Joseph Campolo, managing partner at Campolo, Middleton & McCormick, a law firm with headquarters in Ronkonkoma, where a new transit-oriented development is expected to break ground next month.

Additional panelists included Jim Coughlan, principal of Tritec Real Estate; Marty Dettling, senior vice president of the Albanese Organization; and Don Monti of Renaissance Downtowns.

Read it on LIBN: http://libn.com/2017/05/25/leaders-speak-of-a-retrofitted-suburbia/

Amendments to Not-For-Profit Corporation Law Effective May 27th

Posted: May 25th, 2017

Tags: ,

Important new amendments (“Amendments”) to the New York Not-For-Profit Corporation Law will go into effect on May 27, 2017.  The Amendments aim to mend inconsistencies in the law since the Nonprofit Revitalization Act, which went into effect in 2013.  New York Not-For-Profit Corporations should review their bylaws and conflict of interest policies to make sure they are up to date with these most recent changes.

One of the major changes is to the definition of a “Related Party.”  The term was revised to include directors, officers, Key Persons (discussed below), any of their relatives, and any entity in which the directors, officers, Key Persons (or their relatives) have more than 35% interest. If the entity is a partnership, the threshold is a 5% interest.

For the purposes of defining who is a related party, the Amendment replaces “key employee” with “Key Person.”  A Key Person is not a director or officer (but may or may not be an employee) but has substantial influence over the corporation, manages a substantial portion of the corporation, or controls a substantial portion of the corporation’s finances. A Key Person is now subject to the Conflict of Interest Policy.

Perhaps the most significant change concerns related party transactions.  Generally, a related party transaction is one from which a person within the nonprofit, or a relative, will receive a financial benefit.  Previously, the law prohibited this type of transaction unless the Board determined that it was in the nonprofit’s best interest.  The Amendments provide some exceptions to what is considered a related party transaction, such as (1) if the related party’s interest in the transaction is “de minimis,” (2) if the type of transaction is not customarily reviewed by similar boards of similar organizations, and (3) if the related party is the type of person that the non-profit is organized to benefit as part of its mission.  These exceptions align with previously published guidance from the New York Attorney General’s Office.

The Amendment now permits the nonprofit’s Board of Directors to appoint a committee to approve a related party transaction.  Additionally, the nonprofit will now have a limited defense to an action brought by the Attorney General’s office related to improperly authorized related party transactions if the nonprofit can prove it took certain actions.

Generally, directors who have an interest in a transaction are not permitted to be present during deliberations of the Board, or a committee of the Board, on whether to enter into the transaction. However, the recent change clarifies that the interested director may be asked by the Board to present information or answers to the Board’s questions regarding the transaction.

The Amendment modifies the definition of “independent director” to now provide a sliding scale for disqualification in making certain decisions for the nonprofit.  For example, now a director may still be considered independent even if the director, or her relative, has received a benefit of $10,000 or less in the three preceding years if the nonprofit’s gross revenues are less than $500,000 per year.

Generally, Executive Committees are committees of the Board and have the authority to bind the corporation in certain circumstances.  Previously, a majority vote of all members of the Board of Directors was required to designate an Executive Committee.  The recent change now allows a majority of a quorum present at the Board meeting to designate an Executive Committee.

Another change is that certain duties of the Board cannot be delegated to the Executive Committee. Non-delegable duties include (1) the election or removal of officers and directors, (2) the approval of a merger or plan of dissolution, (3) the adoption of a resolution authorizing the sale, lease, exchange or other disposition of all or substantially all the assets of the corporation, and (4) the approval of amendments to the certificate of incorporation.

Previously, employees of a non-profit could not serve as Chairperson of the Board of Directors.  However, the changes now permit an employee to serve as Chairperson so long as the Board approves the appointment by a 2/3 vote and memorializes the basis for the Board’s approval.  This change went into effect on January 1, 2017.

If you have any questions about the Amendments or would like your bylaws and conflict of interest policy to be reviewed, please do not hesitate to give us a call.

The information contained in this article is provided for informational purposes only and is not and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. The firm provides legal advice and other services only to persons or entities with which it has established an attorney-client relationship.

Focus on Long-Term Care: Activities of Daily Living

Posted: May 25th, 2017

By: Martin Glass, Esq. email

Tags:

Most people go around and take care of their everyday business without ever realizing how independent they are.  Only when you have trouble doing something do you realize that you used to do it before.  For a younger person, this can come when you injure yourself and may have limited use of an arm or a leg.  Unfortunately, this also comes with age.

Often times we see a friend or family member that has trouble doing things that they’ve always done.  These things are usually called the Activities of Daily Living (ADLs).

Most ADLs are basic self‑care tasks that you learn as a child such as bathing, dressing, or eating.  Don’t confuse them with Instrumental Activities of Daily Living (IADLs), which are similar but are actually more complex skills.

IADLs are skills you need to live independently without some type of assistance.  You tend to learn these IADL skills a little later in life, such as in your teens.  They include things like using the phone, understanding and managing finances, managing medications, food shopping, cooking, and housekeeping.

People diagnosed with Alzheimer’s disease or dementia normally have trouble with IADLs and often require some type of companion care.  Companions do not “touch the client” and therefore do not normally need any special type of licensing.

ADLs are different.  These affect the ability for someone to independently care for themselves.  Normally, for someone to trigger their Long Term Care (LTC) Insurance or obtain Community Care Medicaid, a nurse must first conduct an evaluation to determine the level of assistance needed to carry out these ADLs.  The more assistance that is needed, the more care the insurance or Medicaid will cover.

Only six ADLs are recognized.  They are:

  1. Toileting: Getting on and off the toilet
  2. Continence: Controlling your bladder and bowel functions
  3. Bathing: Cleaning and grooming activities such as showering, shaving, and brushing teeth
  4. Dressing: Getting dressed by yourself without having trouble with zippers and buttons
  5. Eating: Feeding yourself without much difficulty
  6. Transferring: Walking or moving from a wheelchair to a bed and back again

Because assistance with these functions requires the person to be “touched,” in New York it requires the aide to have some training and the home care agency to be certified.

The Medicaid program will not typically pay for companion care where only the person’s IADLs have been affected.  You will have to show that your loved one needs assistance with the ADLs.  Depending on the particular LTC insurance, you may be able to get some assistance with the IADLs, along with the ADLs.

For assistance with applying for Community Care Medicaid or for questions regarding your loved one’s long-term care insurance, please contact us.

The information contained in this article is provided for informational purposes only and is not and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. The firm provides legal advice and other services only to persons or entities with which it has established an attorney-client relationship.

In Depth: The Closing Deed

Posted: May 25th, 2017

Tags:

Have you ever taken a look at the deed to your home and wondered, “What does it mean and what does it do?” You have spent a large sum of money at the closing table and signed voluminous amounts of mortgage documents, only to walk away with a piece of paper that gets recorded in the Clerk’s office in the County where the property is located.  But this piece of paper is filled with more information than meets the eye.

At the top of the deed, just below the date of the conveyance, the “grantor” is named. The grantor is the seller, or the person(s) or entity conveying the property, also known as “the party of the first part.” Thereafter the “grantee” is named, that is the buyer who is known as “the party of the second part,” and now the new owner.

When more than one grantee is named, it is important to consider the manner in which they are named, because there are different ways to hold title in New York. Married couples, as a general rule, go into title as “husband and wife” or “tenants by the entirety.”  The deed would recite: John Brown and Mary Brown, as tenants by the entirety or John Brown and Mary Brown, as husband and wife. What this means is that if one spouse dies, the property is automatically owned one hundred percent by the surviving spouse. If the deed does not recite as “husband and wife” or as “tenants by the entirety,” title is still deemed to be held with survivorship rights if the couple is married, unless specifically stated otherwise.

If two (or more) individuals are named on a deed who are not married, and there is no language specifying the form of ownership, title is deemed to be held as “tenants in common.” In this form of ownership, there are no survivorship rights. If one person dies, their percentage of ownership interest passes to their heirs, not the surviving individual on the deed, unless that individual happens to be their heir. If the two individuals want survivorship rights like a married couple without being married, the deed must specifically state as “joint tenants with rights of survivorship.”

In certain instances there may be a benefit for a married couple to go into title as tenants in common if the value of the property is such that the parties and their heirs can benefit from utilizing certain estate tax exemptions in the most effective way upon each other’s deaths.

Below the grantee section is conveyance language and a description of the property being transferred. It is either a metes and bounds description, which is gleaned from a survey, or a reference to a duly filed subdivision map. Sometimes it is referred to as “Schedule A” and referenced on a subsequent page.

The language below the property description will vary depending upon the type of deed (Warranty, Bargain and Sale with Covenant against Grantors Acts, Bargain and Sale, Quit Claim, Fiduciary, Executor or Administrator’s) being delivered.

The grantor(s) signs at the bottom of the deed and his or her signature must be acknowledged before a notary so that the deed can be recorded in the County Clerk’s office.

The information contained in this article is provided for informational purposes only and is not and should not be construed as legal advice on any subject matter. The firm provides legal advice and other services only to persons or entities with which it has established an attorney-client relationship.